![night of revenge 4chan night of revenge 4chan](https://i.redd.it/jq533sebtke11.jpg)
Lucy Hastings, director at Victim Support, a charity that provides support for cases of domestic and sexual abuse, said more needed to be done to support victims of revenge porn.įor Facebook, revenge porn remains a major issue. Last year was the first year prosecutions for revenge porn had been included in its figures for England and Wales. A report by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) also revealed social media was a "growing trend" connected to revenge porn offences, as in some cases defendants used social networks such as Facebook to distribute intimate pictures of victims. In September last year, it was announced that a total of 206 people had been prosecuted under the "revenge porn” law since it came into effect. The maximum prison sentence for distributing revenge porn is two years. Distributors of non-consensual pornography can also be prosecuted under the Malicious Communications Act or the Stalking and Harassment Act, though to be prosecuted under the latter behaviour would have to be "a repeated act". Non-consensual pornography was criminalised in the UK in April 2015, with an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill that stated it would be an offence for a person to "publish a private sexual image of another identifiable person without their consent where this disclosure causes distress". Ten of these cases involved girls under the age of consent. In October 2015 an FOI request from The Guardian revealed that there were a total of 139 revenge porn allegations in the UK between January and April of 2015. Earlier this year, a group of University College Dublin students were found sharing naked photos of women they'd slept with on a Facebook group a female student told the university's College Tribune newspaperthat members of the group were "sharing stories about girls they'd slept with, rating them out of ten and sharing the girls' nude photos". She'd become just one of many victims of 'revenge porn', also known as non-consensual pornography, where explicit sexual images of someone are distributed without their knowledge or consent. Mutual friends had been tagged, and so had Rachel – meaning her entire friends list, including members of her family, could see the pictures. When she got home, she realised what he'd meant – several naked photos of her, sent during their relationship, had been posted on Facebook.
![night of revenge 4chan night of revenge 4chan](https://img.ifunny.co/images/062b0221928cf678b1c7a145a0ae796d956e39499c9698c5d77f3d56ebafaad5_1.jpg)
All rights reserved."He texts me saying: 'You're gonna be really sorry you did that'" The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2015 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. Like so many subjects of hackers’ ire, Shkreli now has to worry about personal attacks. Artists share images - but hackers also share stolen goods.
![night of revenge 4chan night of revenge 4chan](https://i.imgur.com/LDFjeCNm.jpg)
![night of revenge 4chan night of revenge 4chan](https://i.imgur.com/Y76wkww.png)
The image-sharing board has a reputation for being one of the seediest places on the Internet, where juvenile humor and unrestricted speech often results in discussion and sharing of illegal or unsavory content. That’s usually the price people pay when their personal contact information ends up on a website like 4chan. He did not respond to say whether prank phone calls and text messages kept him up Wednesday night. One person who supported exposing Shkreli’s information wrote, "You’re doing God’s work." Another said Shkreli deserved it: "It’s extortion of the terminally ill."ĬNNMoney called the number and got Shkreli’s voicemail - which was full. Subsequent online comments suggested ordering pizza to his Manhattan apartment and sending prostitutes who demand pills as payment. Attached was this message: "If you want to discuss the increase of AIDS medication with Martin personally." It was only a matter of time until someone exposed his personal details - an act called "doxxing" in online slang.Īt 11:29 p.m., someone posted a photo of Shkreli smirking. Shkreli’s actions shocked the nation this week, leading many to cry for punishing revenge on Shkreli himself. It was only after a wave of critical national news stories - and damning comments by politicians about drug "price gouging" - that Shkreli announced he would "lower the price of Daraprim to a price that is more affordable." It’s not clear what his pharmaceutical company, Turing, will now charge. The drug, which fights parasitic infections, cost AIDS patients 55 times more than before. Shkreli is the former Wall Street guy who now leads a pharmaceutical company - and recently raised the price on a long-existing drug called Daraprim from $13.50 a pill to $750 overnight.